Critical analysis of your own personnel leadership approach, with an Essay

Critical analysis of your own personnel leading approach, with an action plan for develop your own leadership potential - Essay ExampleAccording to Northhouse (2003), most traits studied in leadership are of men and most people perceive leadership as for men. But it is of reality like a shot that many great leaders are women.As much as people know the splendour of a leader, in a leaders mind and heart, it is as well important to assess his own leadership modality for further development. In this paper, we lead examine the causes personal leadership and management style. In the end, the author is shiny to inculcate lessons regarding leadership from his own leadership style and personnel management approach and hopefully be able to find out key elements in improving his own leadership.The author as a leader is democratic. He is democratic in a sense that he wills exemption to his members. Freedom is manifested in the fact the he encourages creative thinking from his members. His members are allowed to conceptualize ideas regarding the steps needed by the administration in taking the path towards success. His members are free to suggest action plans on how the organization will move. As a matter of fact, he requires each member to submit an action plan. He also emphasized the promotion of an atmosphere of free thinking.He also banners a participative leadership. Participative leadership consults with subordinates about decisions (Daft 2004). He does not give much pressure to his members. He believes that free thinking can promote a healthier environment for his members and will let them achieve better ends in their endeavor of achieving success. He gives tasks in a manner that his members enjoy doing it. But he also emphasized that freedom is limited to the point that there is constantly discipline in his members. The freedom that he gives is not absolute because he always wants discipline to be bannered by his members.The authors leadership also crea tes a spirit of trust to his employees. This presupposes an atmosphere of freedom and innovation that banners free thinking. Given that a leader must have trust to his members, this will then pave way for his members to have confidence in themselves. The confidence that they gain will now give them the opportunity to innovate and create new schemes for the organization on what they deem important and vital for the progression of its success. Employees can now be active players of the whole brain of an organization that runs the whole system. This will not only lead to growth of every employee but also to the organization as a whole.The author is also a leader that understands that man is basically a playing field. This idea is from the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. A subject can transcend predications and qualities that can be embedded unto him. Subjectivity entails possibilities and potentialities that people have. One cannot be boxed in(p) or limited to a certain this or tha t. One is more than this that confronts a leader or anyone, one can be anything. Thus, he is a leader that relates beyond his function. Recognizing the subjectivity of people transcends true objective interaction. Both of the parties involved are always in the perspective of openness.Openness is the acceptance of the opposite as a being just like oneself. The other is also unique and full of potentialities and thus, cannot be limited to a mere function or object. There is a sense of